
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Wired Getting Tired?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2005/01/25/is-wired-getting-tired/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2005/01/25/is-wired-getting-tired/</link>
	<description>All the makings of a real web site, plus my stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2005/01/25/is-wired-getting-tired/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasoncoleman.net/archives/2005/01/25/is-wired-getting-tired/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I subscribe to Wired and I don't think this issue is going to make me change my mind about that. I really do look forward to reading it each month, and that's why when it's not up to average, I feel let down. I did enjoy reading the two articles I mentioned above, but I wouldn't consider them &#34;cutting edge&#34;. However, I don't read &lt;a href="http:www.menshealth.com"&gt;Men's Health&lt;/a&gt; for the cutting edge in health news. I'd read a medical journal for that. Nope, it's all about the great writing, which both magazines definitely have.
I was just hoping to get Wired's views on the Mac Mini, TiVo ToGo, and some other news of the last month. For what it's worth, they have some stories online about some of that. Different group at the web site, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I subscribe to Wired and I don&#8217;t think this issue is going to make me change my mind about that. I really do look forward to reading it each month, and that&#8217;s why when it&#8217;s not up to average, I feel let down. I did enjoy reading the two articles I mentioned above, but I wouldn&#8217;t consider them &quot;cutting edge&quot;. However, I don&#8217;t read <a href="http:www.menshealth.com">Men&#8217;s Health</a> for the cutting edge in health news. I&#8217;d read a medical journal for that. Nope, it&#8217;s all about the great writing, which both magazines definitely have.<br />
I was just hoping to get Wired&#8217;s views on the Mac Mini, TiVo ToGo, and some other news of the last month. For what it&#8217;s worth, they have some stories online about some of that. Different group at the web site, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2005/01/25/is-wired-getting-tired/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasoncoleman.net/archives/2005/01/25/is-wired-getting-tired/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Hmm. After all the good things I've heard about Wired, now, I'm starting to wonder. I've only actually read one print version of this magazine. It was interesting. I'll have to say, though, before I'll subscribe to a cutting/bleeding-edge technology and news mag, I'd like to know if it's really going to keep on top of things. Thanks for the caveat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. After all the good things I&#8217;ve heard about Wired, now, I&#8217;m starting to wonder. I&#8217;ve only actually read one print version of this magazine. It was interesting. I&#8217;ll have to say, though, before I&#8217;ll subscribe to a cutting/bleeding-edge technology and news mag, I&#8217;d like to know if it&#8217;s really going to keep on top of things. Thanks for the caveat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
