
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sanity Prevails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2005/05/24/sanity-prevails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2005/05/24/sanity-prevails/</link>
	<description>All the makings of a real web site, plus my stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2005/05/24/sanity-prevails/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 19:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasoncoleman.net/archives/2005/05/24/sanity-prevails/#comment-886</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Senate is a body that works based on majority rule, which is fine. However, the filibuster is the power-tool of the minority. It isn't to be used lightly, and the Democrats (to their credit) weren't doing that. They were blocking some 9 or 10 out of 250 court appointees, which isn't really different than when the roles were switched under the Clinton administration, only then the Republicans used more procedural tactics rather than the filibuster. That's more shady if you ask me, but for another conversation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To do away with the filibuster, if even only for judicial nominations, is remarkably heavy handed. I am truly surprised to see Bill Frist trying this. He just doesn't have that kind of political clout (not yet). He obviously wants to have the path clear for getting a conservative into the next Supreme Court opening (a slot which is every President's dream-of-dreams). If Frist can do it now, great. If he could do it as the next president, which he appears to have serious aspirations on, even better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a man who got into the Senate as something of a moderate, and who in the last couple of years has worked tirelessly to pander to the hardcore, fascist right wing. This, along with the Terri Schaivo diagnosis-by-video-cassette, are some of the latest in a string of remarkably disturbing moves. He is solidifying the religious right base for the 2008 nomination. What's every bit as scary as the fact that he seems to be the current favorite (even over Jeb Bush), is the fact that his dumb moves seem to be paying off amongst that group, no matter how much mainstream American may disapprove.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;You can always hop up on your soap box here, be it a right or left or indifferent one. That's what the comment form is for.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate is a body that works based on majority rule, which is fine. However, the filibuster is the power-tool of the minority. It isn&#8217;t to be used lightly, and the Democrats (to their credit) weren&#8217;t doing that. They were blocking some 9 or 10 out of 250 court appointees, which isn&#8217;t really different than when the roles were switched under the Clinton administration, only then the Republicans used more procedural tactics rather than the filibuster. That&#8217;s more shady if you ask me, but for another conversation.</p>
<p>To do away with the filibuster, if even only for judicial nominations, is remarkably heavy handed. I am truly surprised to see Bill Frist trying this. He just doesn&#8217;t have that kind of political clout (not yet). He obviously wants to have the path clear for getting a conservative into the next Supreme Court opening (a slot which is every President&#8217;s dream-of-dreams). If Frist can do it now, great. If he could do it as the next president, which he appears to have serious aspirations on, even better.</p>
<p>This is a man who got into the Senate as something of a moderate, and who in the last couple of years has worked tirelessly to pander to the hardcore, fascist right wing. This, along with the Terri Schaivo diagnosis-by-video-cassette, are some of the latest in a string of remarkably disturbing moves. He is solidifying the religious right base for the 2008 nomination. What&#8217;s every bit as scary as the fact that he seems to be the current favorite (even over Jeb Bush), is the fact that his dumb moves seem to be paying off amongst that group, no matter how much mainstream American may disapprove.</p>
<p><em>You can always hop up on your soap box here, be it a right or left or indifferent one. That&#8217;s what the comment form is for.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacie</title>
		<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2005/05/24/sanity-prevails/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>stacie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasoncoleman.net/archives/2005/05/24/sanity-prevails/#comment-885</guid>
		<description>I'm glad there was a compromise, but can't you imagine what would happen to the voice of the minority if the judicial filibuster was eliminated? Frist is a fascist. I'll just step off this little box now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad there was a compromise, but can&#8217;t you imagine what would happen to the voice of the minority if the judicial filibuster was eliminated? Frist is a fascist. I&#8217;ll just step off this little box now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
