
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Scanner Brightly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2006/02/01/a-scanner-brightly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2006/02/01/a-scanner-brightly/</link>
	<description>All the makings of a real web site, plus my stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2006/02/01/a-scanner-brightly/#comment-8287</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 01:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2006/02/01/a-scanner-brightly/#comment-8287</guid>
		<description>This is a Bump for JJ's question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a Bump for JJ&#8217;s question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason J</title>
		<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2006/02/01/a-scanner-brightly/#comment-4107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2006/02/01/a-scanner-brightly/#comment-4107</guid>
		<description>After I read this post, I looked at reviews of this scanner. It seems that most people say it's a great scanner if you need portability and a small footprint. They also say that it's slower and lower-res than larger, less-portable scanners.

Based on your research, do you have any recommendations for someone who is looking for a good, fast, not-quite-as-portable scanner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After I read this post, I looked at reviews of this scanner. It seems that most people say it&#8217;s a great scanner if you need portability and a small footprint. They also say that it&#8217;s slower and lower-res than larger, less-portable scanners.</p>
<p>Based on your research, do you have any recommendations for someone who is looking for a good, fast, not-quite-as-portable scanner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
