
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethanol Health Risks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2007/04/19/ethanol-health-risks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2007/04/19/ethanol-health-risks/</link>
	<description>All the makings of a real web site, plus my stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2007/04/19/ethanol-health-risks/#comment-50372</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasoncoleman.net/2007/04/19/ethanol-health-risks/#comment-50372</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Some more information: &lt;a href="http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/418/1?rss=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;This news item from &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; indicates that the predicted 185 deaths annually in the U.S. (due to a switch to Ethanol) would be a 4% increase. Not sure how that math came about, but then again, I haven't had the chance to read &lt;a href="http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dr. Jacobson&lt;/a&gt;'s paper yet, either (published today in the journal &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/esthag/asap/abs/es062085v.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Environmental Science &#38; Technology&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; [abstract, article for pay journal subscribers only]).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again, I do not mean to fault Dr. Jacobson's work. If it stands to peer review (which is apparently has), then I by no means wish to imply his work is not accurate. Rather, I simply think that this represents a first step towards understand the risks associated with Ethanol and simply one part of the data set needed for good policy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some more information: <a href="http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/418/1?rss=1" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/sciencenow.sciencemag.org');">This news item from <em>Science</em></a> indicates that the predicted 185 deaths annually in the U.S. (due to a switch to Ethanol) would be a 4% increase. Not sure how that math came about, but then again, I haven&#8217;t had the chance to read <a href="http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.stanford.edu');">Dr. Jacobson</a>&#8217;s paper yet, either (published today in the journal <em><a href="http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/esthag/asap/abs/es062085v.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/pubs.acs.org');">Environmental Science &amp; Technology</a></em> [abstract, article for pay journal subscribers only]).</p>
<p>Again, I do not mean to fault Dr. Jacobson&#8217;s work. If it stands to peer review (which is apparently has), then I by no means wish to imply his work is not accurate. Rather, I simply think that this represents a first step towards understand the risks associated with Ethanol and simply one part of the data set needed for good policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
