[I’ve been meaning to do a lot more of this, but better late than never. This is one of the posts on a project I’ve was involved with at my former employer. However, for what it’s worth, this is the first structure I’ve designed that has yet to be built.]
Over two years ago, I began working on part of the design team for the IH-10 and Beltway 8 interchange West of Houston, Texas. I spent about three months down in Tampa and then another 4 months on and off back here in Richmond working on the job.

A view of some of the tall piers at the IH-10/BW‑8 Interchange. Note the Texas star detail cast into each pier.
My role was as structural engineer for the left-turn fly-overs. Those are the highest portion of the overall interchange (.pdf file); the ones where you exit one freeway to the right to “fly over” the rest of the interchange to head left onto the intersecting freeway. I did the structural design for approximately 1.2 miles of bridge, with spans up to 375 feet. All the bridges were single lane. Also, the structure type was a double steel tub-girder. These are some very clean-lined structures once finished. I can say that, as I had no decision in the structure type and layout whatsoever. I simply decided how thick to make all the plates. Sounds so simple, doesn’t it?
The KATY Corridor project is a huge construction project, widening and renovating roughly 20 miles of IH-10 between Houston and Katy, TX at a cost of $1.44 billion (yes, that’s a B). The section this interchange is in, called Contract D, came in with a $250 million price tag. That’s a rather large civil project, by any terms.
This was a great project to learn on, as curved bridges have some force effects due to gravity that many other bridges don’t experience. The portion of the bridge that sweeps out beyond the straight line connecting the supporting piers creates an immense twist throughout the bridges length (think of wringing out a dishtowel). This is resolved within the superstructure by that tub (or trapezoidal) shaped box section. The level of force is tremendous, as is the size of steel plates involved in the bridge girders. Two steel boxes which are 8′-6″ deep and 8′-0″ wide (at the top) carry a concrete road deck and vehicular traffic up to 375 feet between piers at 85 feet in the air. There are three levels of traffic below the bridge at it’s highest point. It is a symphony of steel and concrete that takes years to design and build.
My part in it was rather small, but I learned so much from it. I had the pleasure of working with great engineers who truly wanted a safe and aesthetically pleasing bridge. I realize there was, and remains, a great deal of controversy involving this project. However, in the end, I hope the citizens of Texas can enjoy and appreciate their road. Structures such as this one are a product of a society that cherishes the automobile almost as family. It’s nice when we can have pleasant roads and bridges with which to put them on.
[lives in houston off of 290/west] WHY is it that HOUSTON has decided to work on EVERY major hwy 10, 610, 59, beltway 8 and whatever else all at the SAME time…i can’t wait till the katy freeway is finished and 59 isn’t closed anymore on the weekends…ugh…terrible constrution, and terrible planning IMO
Well, Latisha, I guest you should really direct your complaint to Austin, since this is a TxDOT project. Of course, my understanding is that the Texas legislature does a lot of really odd things. As to the “why” part of your question, I’m afraid I was way too far the food chain of this project to begin to answer it. I can say this, if a state has the money to spend on construction projects, they seem to rarely wait for a better time and just spend it immediately.
Here in Richmond, there is a rather large bridge widening project underway about a mile from my home (also one of my former employer’s projects). I understand how frustrating it is to have to deal with large civil project such as the KATY corridor. They stretch for many years and cause inconvenience on nearly just as large a scale. However, once it’s all said and done, traffic should be much better (at least for the next 20 years or so). Of course, having several major arteries in the western part of Houston seems to be poor planning, indeed.
Well, that’s a lot of words for not much of a response. Thanks for posting a comment all the same. I hope to hear from you again sometime.