Some Thought’s on Religion

Just some Fri­day after­noon rumi­na­tions on religion.

Eastern Hardliners?

You real­ly nev­er hear or read any­thing about Bud­dhist fun­da­men­tal­ists. I’m sure they exist, giv­en that fas­cism seems to know no geo­graph­ic, eth­nic, or reli­gious bound­aries. How­ev­er, I sup­pose the rare cas­es are the excep­tions prov­ing the rule. I sup­pose it’s just hard to get that worked up about non-exis­tence, as opposed to that whole heav­en vs. hell thing.

Water At Communion?

I find many of the traits of South­ern Bap­tists odd. One is the notion that alco­hol is wrong. I’m not debat­ing drunk­en­ness here, just alco­hol in gen­er­al. Of all the world’s major reli­gions, east and west, the Judeo-Chris­t­ian sec­tion is the only one that does not out-and-out for­bid alco­hol. Fur­ther, for Chris­tians, they have the only deity who not only drank it open­ly, but is renowned for His abil­i­ty to turn water into it! Don’t tell the South­ern Bap­tists (among some oth­ers) though, as they have all pen­ciled into their bibles that Jesus turned the wine into water.

No Cell Phone For You!

There is a lot of dis­cus­sion in this coun­try going on (again) about the teach­ing of evo­lu­tion vs. cre­ation­ism in pub­lic schools. This time, cre­ation­ism has been brand­ed Intel­li­gent Design®. How­ev­er, there are also school sys­tems which have added dis­claimers to class­es and text­books inform­ing stu­dents that evo­lu­tion is only a the­o­ry and, there­fore, should be tak­en with a grain of salt. This is using legal-ese and plain speech to mis-con­strue the lan­guage of sci­ence. Vast sec­tions of sci­en­tif­ic fields are noth­ing more than work­ing the­o­ries: it’s hard to prove every­thing. When you stack these up against faith (reli­gion, spir­i­tu­al­i­ty, etc.), which is by def­i­n­i­tion, with­out proof, it is of course going to fall short. How­ev­er, I think we’re going to have to make a choice as a country:

  1. Use sci­ence and the sci­en­tif­ic method to con­tin­ue to improve the human con­di­tion through med­i­cine, engi­neer­ing, and tech­nol­o­gy, or
  2. Allow the fun­da­men­tal­ist influ­enced poli­cies to push us all back into the stone ages.

I’d argue there is a direct link between the fun­da­men­tal­ist nature of a country/region and it’s rank­ing on the world­wide scale of civ­i­liza­tions. When you don’t allow peo­ple to pur­sue where dis­cov­ery and imag­i­na­tion take them, you don’t move for­ward as a peo­ple. So, here’s my new rule: future ben­e­fits of sci­ence that have stemmed from bio­log­i­cal (evo­lu­tion) and phys­i­cal (big-bang, quan­tum physics) stud­ies should not be allowed to be used by those who can­not at least agree that these ideas mer­it teach­ing. The free­dom of reli­gion in this coun­try guar­an­tees the right to pass on reli­gious views. What will guar­an­ty our right to ensure that we are also well versed in the sciences?

Long Haired Hippie Savior?

Jesus of Nazareth said and did many things that have inspired mil­lions, and not all white Repub­li­cans. As I men­tioned, He was known for his abil­i­ty to pro­vide drinks for His friends. He also was a pro­po­nent of social care sys­tems, such as: defend­ing the meek (access to legal care), feed­ing the hun­gry (wel­fare sys­tems), heal­ing the sick (pro bono mir­a­cles, as in free health care), and so on. Fur­ther, every pic­ture I’ve ever seen of the Christ reminds me a lot of Duane All­man. He is also always wear­ing san­dals and loose clothes in these images. What does all this point to? Jesus was the epit­o­me of the social­ist, hip­pie move­ment. Iron­ic isn’t it, then, that the 50’s obsessed right-wing move­ment has adopt­ed Him as their mascot?

Force · Distance = Work, Except on Sundays

Not sur­pris­ing­ly, dif­fer­ent Jews and Chris­tians have vary­ing atti­tudes on work­ing on the Sab­bath. I always saw this as a sort of union/worker’s rights demand from up on high: you all should take a day of rest each week and thank God you’re able to (this falls under the pre­vi­ous sec­tion, as well). How­ev­er, my under­stand­ing is that many Jews and Chris­tians go well out of their way as to do no work on Sun­day and fur­ther use as lit­tle effort as pos­si­ble. Exam­ple, peo­ple who tape down the auto-off switch­es on their ovens so they aren’t tech­ni­cal­ly “bak­ing” on the sab­bath. How­ev­er, I’m an engi­neer, and I have two def­i­n­i­tions for work:

  1. Pro­fes­sion­al Work
    Phys­i­cal and men­tal effort for which an indi­vid­ual is paid a wage or oth­er­wise com­pen­sat­ed by anoth­er indi­vid­ual or organization.
  2. Mechan­i­cal Work
    The prod­uct of a force times the dis­tance through which it moves.

Now, if we define work for the pur­pos­es of what-to-avoid-on-Sun­days as Mechan­i­cal Work, you real­ly need to just stop breath­ing after mid­night on Sat­ur­day. Any­thing oth­er than that, and you’re doing work. Okay, that seems a lit­tle hard to for 24 whole hours each week, so let’s use the for­mer. That’s what I use, which is just a lay-per­sons def­i­n­i­tion of work. There­fore, I gar­den, I run, I bake, I do what­ev­er I feel like on Sun­day. I have even bro­ken that rule and worked for mon­ey on Sun­days, in order to try and keep my job so I would­n’t have to spend every­day of the week not doing work for mon­ey. How­ev­er, I don’t spend my time on Sun­day sneer­ing at oth­ers gar­den­ing, run­ning, bak­ing etc. while on my way to church. I think some of the res­i­dents of Rich­mond might do well to do the same.

Published
Categorized as Life

By Jason Coleman

Structural engineer and technical content manager Bentley Systems by day. Geeky father and husband all the rest of time.

4 comments

  1. Thank you for the dis­ser­ta­tion on reli­gion. I find it as inter­est­ing that the Con­ser­v­a­tive Right just loves Jesus and do all they can to show the world how a Chris­t­ian should not act… Lie,Cheat and Steal to get to the top. That’s what Jesus would do.

  2. I know plen­ty of peo­ple who are con­ser­v­a­tives who real­ly do try and fol­low what they believe to be the cor­rect path. I’m think­ing about fam­i­ly mem­bers, in-laws here, and friends most­ly. How­ev­er, there are so many more who, just as you say, pro­vide an almost per­fect exam­ple of what not to do.

    Take Pat Robert­son call­ing for assas­si­na­tions of for­eign lead­ers (how­ev­er much we may all dis­like that leader) for exam­ple. I don’t think there’s too many (pos­i­tive) exam­ples in the bible to sup­port that kind of behav­ior. Thanks to Mr. Robert­son, we can see the hypocrisy loud and clear, and avoid the same mis­take ourselves.

  3. Sta­cie: You could show her the bit about extrem­ist Bud­dhists. I don’t know if she’d get it (not know­ing how famil­iar she is with East­ern reli­gions), but I don’t think it would offend her.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *